Legal Opinion

Kinzler v. Nacey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1980No. 12923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the circuit court granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment in appellees’ action for cancellation of a purchase agreement and return of their earnest money deposit.

On July 27,1978, the parties entered into a purchase agreement for the sale of a commercial restaurant in Lawrence County known as “The Spruces.” Appellants had operated the restaurant on a full-time basis since May 28, 1976.

Appellees made an earnest money deposit of $25,000 and-took possession of the restaurant on July 30, 1978. Closing was set for August 11, 1978,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hot Springs Independent School District No. 10 v. Fall River Landowners Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lammers v. HeartlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Canal Insurance Co. v. AbrahamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API