Smith v. Housing Auth. of the City of Daytona Beach
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
There are deficiencies in the bill of complaint and procedure in the equity court which render the challenged decree fatally effective. The allegations of the pleading on the sole matter involved are so inconsistent with our former decisions on the subject, which we will cite presently, as to make that pleading amenable to attack upon the ground that it was wholly without equity.
The record of the chancery court is quite brief and its very brevity seems to emphasive its insufficiency. There were filed on the same day, May 19, 1941, a bill of complaint, a notice, and an injunction which was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Harper v. McDavidSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Burbridge v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cordis Corp. v. ProoslinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Saunders v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Youngstown Metropolitan Housing Authority v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- North Dade Water Co. v. Adken Land Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.