Legal Opinion
Keesing v. Apfel
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 18, 2000No. 6:00-cv-01746PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
MCAVOY, District Judge.
Presently before the court is an application to proceed without payment of fees in the instant case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Section 1915 provides that the court may authorize commencement, prosecution, or maintenance of a suit without the prepayment of fees by an individual who shows that he or she is unable to pay court fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff in the instant case has met the financial requirements.
Section 1915 also provides, however, that the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines, inter alia,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ostroff v. State of Fla., Dept. of HealthDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
- Ciccone v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Balodis v. LeavittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Didato v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Keith R. P. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Revi v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Smith v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.