Legal Opinion

Didato v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 4, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MIGUEL ROBERT DIDATO, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CASE NO. 3:18cv341(DFM) : ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER : OF SOCIAL SECURITY, : : Defendant. : RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Pending before the court in this social security appeal is the defendant's motion to dismiss. (Doc. #16.) The motion is granted.1 I. Procedural Background In February 2018, the plaintiff, who is self-represented, commenced this action seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's application for SSA benefits. Attached to the complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George Dietsch v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Escalera v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Brandtner v. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Keesing v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API