Legal Opinion

Carter v. Territory of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1917No. 959PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal prom Water Commissioner. Hon. J. A. Matthewman, Commissioner.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

This is a proceeding brought under the statute (R. L. 1915, Ch. 165) for the purpose of determining water rights in the Waikoloa stream, at Waimea, Island of Hawaii. The petition, which was filed on June 13, 1914, named as respondents the Territory of Hawaii and about sixty-two individuals. Many of the respondents made no appearance and an order of default was entered against them. The petitioner’s claims were contested only by the Territory, and both the Territory and the petitioner have appealed from the decision and decree of the commissioner.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sturr v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Peck v. BaileyHawaii Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Harris v. CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1877
  4. In re the Estate of His Majesty Kamehameha IVHawaii Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Bailey v. GayHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robinson v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API