Legal Opinion
Michael J. Hamm v. Weyauwega Milk Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 13, 2003No. 02-2529PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Michael Hamm alleges that he was sexually harassed at work by his male coworkers and was terminated as a result of his complaints about the harassment in violation of Title VII. The district court concluded that Hamm could not establish that he was discriminated against “because of’ sex as required by Title VII and granted summary judgment in favor of Hamm’s employer, Weyauwega Milk Products. Because we agree with the district court that Hamm’s evidence only supports work performance conflicts or speculation concerning his sexual orientation, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Mich…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kimberly Miller v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Caroline M. Sitar v. Indiana Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ryan Lord v. High Voltage Software, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Brown v. Advocate South Suburban HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.