Legal Opinion

Huttig Millwork Co. v. Randel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to enforce a materialman’s lien on the Sedgwick county courthouse. Plaintiff prevailed, and the board of county commissioners appeals.

The facts were these: The county board let a contract to one Randel to remodel and repair the five floors of the courthouse, but neglected to take a bond to protect the county against liens as provided by law. Plaintiff furnished millwork to Randel, which was used to repair the floors, of the value of $3,242.75, and filed its lien *745therefor in due time. It also gave the county board timely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffith v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Sullivan v. School District No. 39Supreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Union Traction Co. v. Standard Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Wilson v. School District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Snodgrass & Young Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API