Legal Opinion

Yoswick v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 17, 1997No. 139, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this case we must decide whether a judge’s failure to advise a defendant offering to plead guilty of the parole consequences of the sentence renders the plea unknowing and involuntary. We shall hold that the trial court’s failure to advise a defendant who is planning to plead guilty of parole consequences does not render a plea invalid because parole consequences are collateral rather than direct consequences of a guilty plea. We shall further hold that Petitioner failed to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Denisyuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. State v. SyedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API