Legal Opinion

Denisyuk v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 25, 2011No. 45, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants to criminal defendants, among other rights, the right to the effective assistance of defense counsel. McMann v. Rich*466ardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n. 14, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970). We consider in this case whether Petitioner, Mark Denisyuk, a noncitizen1 who in 2006 pleaded guilty to a deportable offense, is entitled to postconviction relief based on the claim that his defense counsel was constitutionally ineffective by failing to notify him of the deportation risks of his guilty plea. The answer to the issue posed is governed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. BrewsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Sergio Perez v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. DeJesusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API