Legal Opinion

Krouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether, under Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) regulations, a Uti*673lization Review (UR) petition may be filed prior to a claimant filing a claim petition and, if so, whether the UR proceeding becomes moot upon the filing of the claim petition. We are also asked to determine whether a worker’s compensation claimant can avoid application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel to a request for medical benefits set forth in a Petition to Review Medical Treatment (Review Petition) where those same medical benefits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Patel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Florence Mining Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. D. Gieniec v. WCAB (Palmerton Hosp. and HM Casualty Ins. Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Dorvilus v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Cardone Industries)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Dorvilus v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Cardone Industries)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API