Legal Opinion

Patel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2904 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

This is an appeal of the decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) determining that Manojkumar D. Patel’s (Claimant’s) second petition to set aside a final receipt is barred by the doctrine of res judicata and denying Claimant’s request for a de novo hearing or a rehearing.

Claimant sustained a work related ankle injury on October 12, 1975 and received workmen’s compensation benefits from March 23, 1976 through July 18, 1976. On July 19, 1976 Claimant returned to work and on October 20, 1976 he signed a final settlement *78receipt. Two days later,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Armco Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kerchner v. Materials Transport Service, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Patel v. Sauquoit Fibers Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Yonkers v. Donora BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Maranc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Christopher v. Council of Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API