Legal Opinion

United States v. American Express Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1915No. 1475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36557 (T. D. 34789).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case is represented by six exhibits, numbered 5, 7, 16, 19, and 20, and one numbered both 6 and 2. All are completed long chains, having at one end a ring and at the other a spring hoolr or ring which may be fastened in the ring at the other end, with one exception (Exhibit 20), from which the plain ring at one end is missing. We judge, however, that chain has been broken and the ring lost. It is treated by counsel as, and we assume it to be, a completed chain.

There is no question that so far as materials and use are concerned these chains are within the provisions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Forstner Chain Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. HerrmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API