Legal Opinion

People v. Heidgen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2013PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Lippman.

Defendants in these three appeals challenge their convictions of depraved indifference murder. Each defendant drove in an outrageously reckless manner while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs and caused the death of at least one other person. Defendants maintain that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support their convictions—specifically, that there was insufficient proof that they had the requisite mental state of depraved indifference. Although intoxicated driving cases that present circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. People v. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. KancharlaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. AlvarezCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2019
  3. People v. LujanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. The People v. Jose MaldonadoNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API