Legal Opinion
People v. Kancharla
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 2014PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
We are asked in these appeals whether the Appellate Division applied the correct legal standard when it reviewed the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting defendants’ convictions for enterprise corruption (Penal Law art 460). We hold that the Appellate Division did not properly consider the elements of the crime under People v Western Express Intl., Inc. (19 NY3d 652 [2012]), that the trial evidence sufficiently *299established defendants’ commission of enterprise corruption and that the Appellate Division should reassess its weight of the evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. RayamNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. JuniorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BaqueNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
- People v. BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. CirinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.