Legal Opinion
Skinner v. John Deere Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 14, 2000No. 91,963PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue in this ease is whether the trial court erred in its denial of the plaintiffs motion for a new trial after it granted summary judgment for the defendant and denied the plaintiffs motion to supplement his response to the motion for summary judgment. We find that the trial court’s denial of the plaintiffs motion for a new trial was proper.
I. FACTS
¶ 2 In December of 1993, a vehicle driven by Debbie Spencer, owned by Larry Spencer Chevrolet, 1 and insured by the defendant, John Deere Insurance Company (Deere) was involved in an accident. Kristie Skinner, a pregnant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Vance v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Halliburton Oil Producing Co. v. GrothausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- May v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- NORMAN PLUMB. SUP. CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITY, INC. v. GillesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Oldenkamp v. United American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Scott v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. QuineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.