Camors-McConnell Co. v. McConnell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
The averments as to the facts of this case, as set out in the bill of complaint, are substantially admitted by the defendant, with the exception that he denies that the contract of January 27, 1900 (Exhibit III to the answer), was made upon the terms set out in the contract of December 8, 1899 (Exhibit A to the bill), or that it had any reference to the provisions of said last-named contract, and that the provisions of article 5 therein were for the use, benefit, and protection of the complainant. And defendant avers that at the time the contract of December 8, 1899,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Meccano, Ltd. v. WagnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1916
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Louis Weber & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1908
- Legg v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.