Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P, J.
This case is the result of a dispute arising from the construction of a new wing of the San Joaquin General Hospital, in which the subcontractor, G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (G & G), failed to pay its workers the prevailing wage rate for their labor classification.
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 (the Union), acting on the assignment of the statutory rights of four workers, sued G & G to recover their unpaid, prevailing wages under Labor Code section 1774 1 and for waiting time penalty wages under section 203.
G & G appeals from the judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Maldonado v. Epsilon Plastics, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.