Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1999No. Case No. 98CA35PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

Appellant James E. Brooks, an inmate at the Chillicothe Correctional Institute, appeals the lower court’s dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment. The appellant assigns the following errors for our review:

1. “Judge Susan E. Boyer (Court), abuses her discretion in determining the Petition for Declaratory Judgment based on a review of ‘its records’ without considering documentation filed by Brooks.”

2. “Judge Susan E. Boyer (Court), commits abuse of discretion at the probation revocation hearing to the prejudice of Brooks resulting in his loss of liberty and denial of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Herrick v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Arbor Health Care Co. v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Weyandt v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Arnott v. ArnottOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Orbe v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  4. Norman v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. BraggsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API