Legal Opinion

Arnott v. Arnott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2010No. 09CA25PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} James Arnott, successor trustee of the Joseph Scott Arnott Revocable Trust (“Trust”), appeals from a declaratory-judgment action in the probate court involving the Trust, which gave James and his brother, Kenneth Arnott, the option to purchase specified parcels of the Trust-owned farmland “at a price equal to the appraised value of said real property as affixed for federal and/or state estate tax purposes.” Kenneth and other beneficiaries disagree with James over the interpretation of this sentence. Kenneth argues that the option price is the value of the realty as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. HeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bilyeu v. Motorists Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arnott v. ArnottOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Pointe At Gateway Condominium Owner's Assn., Inc. v. SchmelzerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. SP9 Ent. Trust v. BrauenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Fagan v. BoggsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API