Legal Opinion
Kaplysh v. Takieddine
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1988No. 87-206PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The primary issues presented in this action are (1) whether Haifa Takieddine was a qualified licensed driver at the time of the accident and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing State Farm’s cross-appeal. We hold in the negative on both issues and, accordingly, affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
As observed above, paragraph two of page two of the rental agreement states:
“Under no circumstances shall vehicle be used, operated or driven * * * (F) by any person except Renter, or a qualified licensed driver provided Renter’s permission be first obtained.” (Emphasis added.)
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Sizzler Family Steak Houses v. Western Sizzlin Steak House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McDonald v. Bedford DatsunOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- One Energy Ents., L.L.C. v. Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State Auto Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tatone, 21753 (9-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. CreechDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2006
- Schmucker v. KurzenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.