McDonald v. Bedford Datsun
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the trial court on plaintiff-appellee Judy McDonald’s claims for breach of contract and violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. 1345.01 et seq. The court found that defendant-appellant Bedford Datsun (“Bedford”) had committed unfair or deceptive acts under the statute by lowering the trade-in price of plaintiff’s automobile as a guise by which Bedford could evade its automobile sales contract with plaintiff. The court awarded plaintiff treble damages amounting to $6,285.15, plus $500 in attorney fees. Bedford now appeals,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Kaplysh v. TakieddineOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Weaver v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gilmore v. American Gas Machine Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1952
3Cited by26 opinions
- Farmers Commission Co. v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Southeast Land Development, Ltd. v. Primrose Management, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Metz v. American Electric Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sentinel Consumer Products, Inc. v. Mills, Hall, Walborn & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Midwest Payment Systems, Inc. v. Citibank Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.