Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Bedford Datsun

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1989No. 54819PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the trial court on plaintiff-appellee Judy McDonald’s claims for breach of contract and violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. 1345.01 et seq. The court found that defendant-appellant Bedford Datsun (“Bedford”) had committed unfair or deceptive acts under the statute by lowering the trade-in price of plaintiff’s automobile as a guise by which Bedford could evade its automobile sales contract with plaintiff. The court awarded plaintiff treble damages amounting to $6,285.15, plus $500 in attorney fees. Bedford now appeals,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kaplysh v. TakieddineOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Weaver v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Gilmore v. American Gas Machine Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1952

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Farmers Commission Co. v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Southeast Land Development, Ltd. v. Primrose Management, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Metz v. American Electric Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Sentinel Consumer Products, Inc. v. Mills, Hall, Walborn & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Midwest Payment Systems, Inc. v. Citibank Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API