Legal Opinion

People v. Sloan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1992PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

In People v Velasco (77 NY2d 469), we held that defendants do not have the right to be personally present during informal questioning of prospective jurors that relates only to grounds for juror disqualification by the court, such as physical impairment, family obligations and work commitments. The issue presented here is whether a defendant has a right to hear and be present during conference questioning concerning issues touching upon the merits, such as in this case, the jurors’ knowledge of and reaction to pretrial publicity concerning the specific…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. CiaccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Maurer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API