Legal Opinion
Oritani Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 16, 1993No. 91-5874PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from an insurance coverage dispute stemming from an incidence of telephone fraud perpetrated against Oritani Savings and Loan (Oritani). Oritani brought suit against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity), seeking a declaratory judgment that Fidelity is obligated to indemnify Oritani under an insurance contract, a Savings and Loan Blanket Bond, executed between the parties. The district court held that Fidelity is obligated under the policy because telephone fraud is covered under the “On Premises” coverage provision in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- First National Bank in Plant City v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Groman v. Township Of ManalapanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L & R Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Troy Chemical Corporation v. Teamsters Union Local No. 408Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.