Legal Opinion
First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 9, 1969No. 19PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
In these cases we are called upon to construe § 7 of the McFadden Act of 1927, 44 Stat. 1228, as amended, 12 U. S. C. § 36, as it relates to the definition of a branch bank for the purpose of determining the scope of branch banking available to a national bank in a State that prohibits branches for state banks.
12 U. S. C. § 36 (f) provides in pertinent part:
“(f) The term ‘branch' as used in this section shall be held to include any branch bank, branch office, branch agency, additional office, or any branch place of business ... at which deposits are received, or checks paid, or money lent.”
Flo…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- First Nat. Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fred O. Dickinson, Jr., Comptroller of the State of Florida v. The First National Bank in Plant City, Plant City, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- First National Bank v. DickinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1967
3Cited by193 opinions
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.