Troy Chemical Corporation v. Teamsters Union Local No. 408
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents an interesting question concerning the authority of a federal district court to preliminarily decide procedural issues as well as the arbitrability of a labor grievance where the union party seeks arbitration. Troy Chemical- Corporation (Troy Chemical) and the Teamsters Union Local No. 408 (the Union) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). On April 23, 1991, Troy Chemical discharged four employees for theft of company property and immediately notified the union shop steward of the discharges. No grievances were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. Flair Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Flight Attendants, Afl-Cio v. Usair, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Michael J. Whittle v. Local 641, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- CGU Life Insurance Co. of America v. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Untracht v. FikriDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 13000 Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, District 13Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.