Legal Opinion
Haehl v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided August 12, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00225PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This putative class action challenges the lending practices of a federally chartered and regulated savings association. Named plaintiffs Brain D. Haehl and Vera Quinn assert that defendant Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. violated the anti-kickback and unearned fee provision of the federal Real Estate Settlement Practices Act (“RES-PA”}, 12 U.S.C. § 2607, by charging and collecting “reconveyance” fees in connection with residential mortgages. In addition, plaintiffs allege state law claims for (1) fraud; (2) concealment, nondisclosure, and breach…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kennedy v. Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Daniel K. Graf v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- State Farm Bank v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.