In re R.J.H.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, and Justice RODRIGUEZ join.
Whether a juvenile’s noncustodial, incul-patory statements, made after the juvenile has already given police a confession inadmissible under state law because a magistrate was not present, are nevertheless voluntary and therefore admissible without offense to the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution must be determined from the totality of the circum*3stances.1 Our main inquiry here is whether the court of appeals correctly applied this test in holding that the admission…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- In the Matter of K.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In re H.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In re S.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Marsh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Turner v. Zellers, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.