Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1931No. 385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Ross brought this action against the Pure Oil Pipe Line Company to recover damages for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for plaintiff defendant has appealed.

At the trial plaintiff testified as a witness in his own behalf. On cross-examination he was asked whether he had pleaded guilty in the county court of Payne County, at Still-water, to selling intoxicating liquor, and had been sentenced to pay a fine of $106 and to serve thirty days in jail. On the objection of counsel for plaintiff the court ruled that a conviction for a violation of a Prohibition Law cannot be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles Creekmore v. C.L. CrossnoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. CGM Contractors, Inc. v. Contractors Environmental Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Oklahoma ex rel. Nesbitt v. Allied Materials Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas v. R. A. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API