Legal Opinion

Charles Creekmore v. C.L. Crossno

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1958No. 5864PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Creekmore sued appellee Crossno for damages allegedly resulting from an automobile collision which occurred near Oilton, Oklahoma, when Creekmore drove from a side road onto a main highway into the path of the car driven by Crossno. At the time visibility was seriously impaired by fog. Creekmore testified that he did not see Crossno who was driving at excessive speed. The jury verdict was for Crossno, the appellee-defendant.

The only point raised by this appeal is the admissibility of testimony of a state patrolman relating to the reputation of Creekmore…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. SmolinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. Modern Reed & Rattan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Swafford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Atkinson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. Lee v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. St. Anthony Hospital v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Zerbinos v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Alfred H. Osborne, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API