Legal Opinion
Oklahoma ex rel. Nesbitt v. Allied Materials Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 24, 1968No. Civ. No. 65-344PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EUBANKS, District Judge.
The defendant Phillips Petroleum Company has filed herein its motion to limit and exclude certain evidence at the trial. Defendants Sunray DX Oil Company and Monarch Refineries, Inc., (now dismissed) have filed their separate motion directed to the same proposition. Both motions have been thoroughly briefed by the moving defendants and plaintiff has filed adequate briefs opposing said motions.
From the briefs relating to this question and from earlier hearings and conferences, the Court understands that all of the remaining defendants, excepting Sunray DX Oil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lillian Kilpatrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lillian KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- CGM Contractors, Inc. v. Contractors Environmental Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Ghadrdan v. GorabiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989