Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Waste Techniques Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 911, 925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

This appeal arises from an action in trespass brought by plaintiff-appellee Ronald Hinton (Hinton) to recover *194damages for injuries incurred by him in an industrial accident while at work at the place of business of his employer, additional defendant-appellant Theresa Friedman & Sons, Inc. (Theresa). The appellants’ claims of error are without merit, and therefore, we will affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Theresa is a manufacturer of fruit preserves, jellies and fruit juices. In 1970, Theresa contracted with defendant-appellant Waste Techniques, Inc. (Waste) to install a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. MamonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Denham v. Holmes ex rel. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Bourette v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API