Legal Opinion

Bourette v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 5, 1984PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Dresser Industries, Inc., appeals from judgments of the Superior Court (Lincoln County) resulting from jury verdicts returned in favor of plaintiffs George Bourette, Sarah Bourette and Gary Landry. Defendant argues that the Superior Court erred in holding that Bourette and Landry were not employees of defendant and therefore barred from common law action by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 39 M.R.S.A. § 28 (1978). In addition, defendant assigns as error references by Bourettes’ counsel during examination of witnesses and argument, to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Timberlake v. Frigon & FrigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Hinton v. Waste Techniques Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Selid Construction Co. v. Guarantee Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gurski v. CulpovichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Marcoux v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. James v. MacDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Williams v. UbaldoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Avery v. Kennebec Millwork, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API