Legal Opinion
Hartzell Industries, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 2001No. C-3-99-325PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #21); DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #23) OVERRULED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation stems from an insurance coverage dispute between the Plaintiffs, Hartzell Industries, Inc., and Hartzell Fan, Inc. (“Hartzell”), 1 and the Defendants, Federal Insurance Company and Chubb Corporation (“Federal”). 2 Hartzell seeks indemnification under the terms of a commercial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Everson v. LorenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Burlington Insurance v. PMI America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Magnus, Inc. v. Diamond State InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Thee Sombrero, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.