Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1929No. 18403. Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Defendant in error, Anna Marek, on February 18, 1926, presented to the Industrial Commission her application for compensation for the death of her husband, Alex Marek, an employee of plaintiff in error, the Philadelphia and Reading Coal .and Iron Company, alleging that on January 20, 1926, “while carrying sacks of coal and loading them on wagons he sustained internal injuries,” and that his death resulted from such accidental injury received in the course of his employment. A hearing was had before an arbitrator, who found that defendant in error was not entitled to recover compensation. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. E. Baggot Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Jakub v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Security Mut. Casualty Co. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Martin v. State Compensation CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ceisel v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Cushman v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API