Legal Opinion
Security Mut. Casualty Co. v. Bolton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 22, 1935No. 13093PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.
The Security Mutual Casualty Company has appealed from a judgment in favor of Clarence Bolton and Carroll Bolton, minor children of James Bolton, deceased, who at the time of his death was an employee of the Fort Worth Cotton Mill, and the recovery was based on a policy of insurance issued by the defendant in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Statutes of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.).
The suit was by J. L. Bolton and Mrs. L. A. Bolton, as next friend of the minor plaintiffs, and their right of recovery was based on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerringTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Mooney v. YeagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- National Life & Accident Co. v. MuckelroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Southern Underwriters v. BoswellTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Van ArsdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Associated Employers Lloyds v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Brodtmann v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.