Foster v. Bringham
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Superior Court of Tippecanoe County.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C. —
Moore mortgaged corn to Bringham to secure the payment of $700 and interest. The mortgage provided that the mortgagor should retain possession until default in payment, and that, if at any time before the day of payment, the mortgagee should “ feel unsafe or insecure,” he might take the corn and sell it to satisfy the debt. Before the day of payment, Foster issued an execution on a judgment he held against Moore, the mortgagor, and the corn, yet in Moore’s possession, was taken under said execution by the sheriff.
The mortgagee brought replevin for the corn against the sheriff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Whitworth v. BallardIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Thomas v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- McComas v. HaasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Whitney v. LehmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Decatur v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Haas v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Butt v. ButtIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Slifer v. State ex rel. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Busching v. SunmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.