McComas v. Haas
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.
— In this case the appellant sued the appelleein a complaint of two paragraphs. The first paragraph counted upon a promissory note; and in the second paragraph, the-appellant declared upon a note and a written contract, which were parts of one and the same transaction. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, and a special verdict was returned, in substance, as follows:
“ We, the jury, being requested to find a special verdict on the facts in this cause, do find the following facts, viz,:
“ 1. That the note and contract, mentioned in plaintiff’s-complaint, were executed by and between…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Over v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pennsylvania Co. v. SedwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Kernodle v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- McLean v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.