Legal Opinion

McComas v. Haas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1884No. 10,576PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

— In this case the appellant sued the appelleein a complaint of two paragraphs. The first paragraph counted upon a promissory note; and in the second paragraph, the-appellant declared upon a note and a written contract, which were parts of one and the same transaction. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, and a special verdict was returned, in substance, as follows:

“ We, the jury, being requested to find a special verdict on the facts in this cause, do find the following facts, viz,:
“ 1. That the note and contract, mentioned in plaintiff’s-complaint, were executed by and between…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Over v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. SedwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Kernodle v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. McLean v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API