Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brigman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1981No. 8028SC741PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The judgment was in the form of a judgment entered after a hearing before the court as a trier of facts. It found facts and based on those findings of fact, made conclusions of law. We have repeatedly called to the attention of trial judges and lawyers that the court does not find facts upon a motion for summary judgment. It is completely obvious that if the court must find facts in order to make conclusions of law, there must be issues of fact, and the case, therefore, is not one in which summary judgment will lie. Summary judgment will lie only in those cases where there…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Johnson v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. West v. SlickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Yadkin Valley Land Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API