Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 9, 2005No. 20030953-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION (For Official Publication)

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Daniel Rogers argues that the State presented insufficient evidence at his first preliminary hearing to bind him over on a count of receiving stolen property, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-408 (2003), charged as a second degree felony under Utah Code section 76-6-412. See id. § 76-6-412. He also contends that the trial court erred in validating the magistrate’s decision to continue the preliminary hearing to permit the State to put on additional evidence at a later date and instead should have quashed his bindover. We agree and reverse.

BA…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. VargoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. MastCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERSUtah Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API