State v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION (For Official Publication)
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Appellant Daniel Rogers argues that the State presented insufficient evidence at his first preliminary hearing to bind him over on a count of receiving stolen property, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-408 (2003), charged as a second degree felony under Utah Code section 76-6-412. See id. § 76-6-412. He also contends that the trial court erred in validating the magistrate’s decision to continue the preliminary hearing to permit the State to put on additional evidence at a later date and instead should have quashed his bindover. We agree and reverse.
BA…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. VargoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. MastCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERSUtah Supreme Court · 2006