Legal Opinion

Conaway v. Yolo Water & Power Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1928No. Docket No. Sac. 3822PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an action by plaintiffs, owners of certain lands lying at the mouth of a watercourse situated in Yolo County known as Willow slough, seeking to enjoin defendant Yolo Water & Power Company, a corporation, and about 80 other defendants, from unlawfully draining into said watercourse after use for irrigation water theretofore conducted into this watershed from Cache Creek.

Appellants have presented a brief in three volumes, which with the appendix covers some 2,500 pages. We mention it because it is admirably arranged, indexed, and cross-indexed and is worthy of imitation; besides it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Barton v. Riverside Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fresno Etc. Co. v. Southern Pac. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API