Fresno Etc. Co. v. Southern Pac. Etc. Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action of ejectment, brought to recover a portion of the right of way claimed by the plaintiff, lying upon Tulare Avenue, a highway in Fresno County. Verdict and judgment went for the plaintiff in the court below, and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendants' motion for a new trial. The appellants make two points on the appeal: 1. That the action of ejectment is not maintainable for the sort of injury here involved; and 2. That the action of ejectment could not be maintained in this case because of the consent or acquiescence of respondent in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- St. Julien v. Morgan Louisiana & Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Child v. . ChappellNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wood v. Truckee Turnpike Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.