Legal Opinion
People v. MacK
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1961No. Crim. 13PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant and from an order denying a new trial.
The District Attorney of Merced County filed an information by which defendant, Vernon Mack, and one Charles Arbuckle were accused of both branches of the crime of forgery, a violation of section 470 of the Penal Code. Subsequently, and on October 28, 1960, the district attorney filed an amended information against the defendant herein and Arbuckle, charging them with the offense of forgery by uttering and passing a check, knowing that it was false, with intent to defraud R. S. Proehlieh.
The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dulsky v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Garcia v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- The People v. Gomez CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.