Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Sturm Lumber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Kandolph County. Action by C. J. Taylor and others as partners against tbe Sturm Lumber Company. Judgment for tbe plaintiffs, and tbe defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, President:

The principal contention against the validity of the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, for damages for breach of a logging contract, brought up by this writ of error, is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict, its sufficiency having been challenged by a motion to exclude it, a request for a peremptory instruction to find for the defendant and a motion to set aside the verdict. Rulings respecting the admission and rejection ¡of evidence and the giving of instructions at the instance of the plaintiffs are also made subjects of assignments -of error.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Unfried v. Balt. & O. R'd Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. City of Chickasha v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. v. LillardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Hardaway-Wright Co. v. Bradley Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Earl T. Browder, Inc. v. County Court of Webster CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hall v. GrovesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Nees v. Julian Goldman Stores, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. A. A. Baxter Corp. v. Colt Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Davis v. First Interstate Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API