Legal Opinion

Hull v. Geary

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Circuit' Court, Kanawha County. Action by E. Flynn Hull against W. B. Geary. Verdict for plaintiff. From an order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

The trial court properly set aside the verdict and granted defendant a new trial. The assignments of error must be overruled and the case remanded.

The action is assumpsit for recovery on a warranty. The warranty was to the effect that certain stock in a corporation, which defendant transferred to plaintiff as part payment for real estate conveyed to the former by the latter, was worth the face value of the shares.

The jury found a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the face value of the shares, with interest. On the question of the actual value of the stock at the time of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Road Commission v. DarrahWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Road Commission v. DarrahWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. West Virginia Department of Highways v. BartlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cook v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API