Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Sorensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1978No. 41551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover damages arising from an automobile accident allegedly the result of negligence by the defendant, Anne Marie Sorensen, and imputed to the defendant, Reuben S. Sorensen, under the family purpose doctrine. Trial was to a jury. At the conclusion of all evidence the District Court, on plaintiff’s motion, instructed the jury that the accident was proximately caused by the negligence of the defendants and directed it to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $358.28 for his property damage. Thus, the only issue submitted to the jury was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Jahnke v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. ReamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. ShellingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Abrams v. LangeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vincent Milone v. Moceri Family, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Smedberg v. Detlef's Custodial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Vacanti v. Master Electronics Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Sanwick v. JensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API