Ross v. Freeman
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
A motion under Rule 44 for a decree notwithstanding answer is in the nature of a de*46murrer to the answer. Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co., 13 Del. Ch. 76, 115 A. 312. Like a demurrer it admits for the moment that the facts set forth in the answer are true. But the admission goes only as to facts. Although a demurrer confesses the matters of fact stated in the bill to be true, it does not admit any matters or conclusions of law which are suggested in the bill or inferred from the facts stated. Daniell’s Chancery Pleading and Practice, (4th Ed.) p. 545. As a motion for decree…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
- Trustees of New Castle Common v. MegginsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1910
- Doughten v. VandeverCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1875
- City of Richmond v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1848
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Appon v. Belle Isle Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Jackson v. RichardsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
- Broeker v. WareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
- Security Trust Co. v. CoolingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.