Legal Opinion
State v. Wood
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 21, 1961No. 281 & 286, Civil Actions, 1960, & 51 & 52, Civil Actions, 1961PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lynch, J.:
The use plaintiff, M. A. Hartnett, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Hartnett), has filed these four suits seeking to recover payment for supplies and materials it allegedly furnished to defendant, James H. Wood (hereafter referred to as Wood), the general contractor on four public projects. Because public projects are involved, Wood was required by 29 Del. C., Ch. 69, § 6902 to furnish a bond, with corporate surety, “conditioned that the contractor shall * * * pay to every person furnishing material and performing labor * * * all sums of money due * * The cited statute authorizes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Karas v. SnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- U. S. Wire & Cable Corp. v. Ascher Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Chambers Gasket & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.