Legal Opinion

Vitale v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1985No. WD 36724PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a civil action seeking monies under the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655, (1983). The trial court entered its judgment of dismissal for failure to join a necessary party. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

This cause spans some 12 years and presents a voluminous history of both federal and state proceedings. A sole point is presented which charges that the trial court erred in the dismissal of appellant’s third party petition because appellant had the right to enforce its claim as a third party donee beneficiary without the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. BurackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Shepherd v. Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Bunker R-III School District v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sher v. ChandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Beck v. PillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Vitale v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
  4. Sher v. ChandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Sher v. ChandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API