Legal Opinion

Sher v. Chand

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1994No. 65221PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by defendant, Dr. Suresh Chand, from a default judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Harold R. Sher, Trustee of the RMS Revocable Trust, Barrie R. Sher, Trustee of the Barrie R. Sher Revocable Trust, Ronald L. Sher, Trustee of the Ronald L. Sher Revocable Trust and Susan S. Csen-gody, d/b/a Sher Properties (plaintiffs). The trial court sustained plaintiffs’ second motion for sanctions for failure to comply with discovery pursuant to Rule 61.01. The court ordered defendant’s pleadings stricken and entered judgment against defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiffs…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Mathewson v. Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. DeLisle v. Cape Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Drew v. LittlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vogt v. EmmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Blake v. IrwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Asmus v. Capital Region Family PracticeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Frontenac Bank v. GB Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. White v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API