Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. Burack
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 14, 1976No. 59081PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARDG1TT, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant’s action was dismissed by the trial court for failure to join a necessary party and an appeal was taken to the Missouri court of appeals, St. Louis district, where, by opinion, the order of dismissal was affirmed. On application of appellant, the case was transferred here by order of this court because the circuit court’s ruling and the court of appeals opinion presented a serious challenge to the scope of S.Ct.Rule 52.04 1 as amended effective December 1, 1972, Art. V, sec. 9, Mo.Const.1945, as amended. S.Ct.Rule 83.03.
On September 20, 1973,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Adams Dairy Company v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- Litzinger v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Keene v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Joel Bianco Kawasaki Plus v. Meramec Valley BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Emcasco Insurance Co. v. RushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Asmus v. Capital Region Family PracticeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bolin v. AndersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.